the recycling myth: where eu waste actually goes

2026-01-29 23:30 803 words 5 min read

no table of contents
eu "recycling" statistics obscure what actually happens. plastic and e-waste is exported to countries with less enforcement capacity. the destination bears the pollution.

the mechanism

  1. eu citizen “recycles” plastic/electronics
  2. waste collected, counted as “recycled”
  3. waste exported to malaysia, turkey, indonesia, ghana
  4. waste burned, dumped, or “processed” in poor conditions
  5. pollution occurs in destination country
  6. eu reports high “recycling rates”
  7. eu criticizes destination country’s pollution

plastic waste data

export volumes

yeareu plastic waste exportsprimary destinations
20161.6 million tonneschina (pre-ban)
20181.4 million tonnesmalaysia, turkey, indonesia
20201.1 million tonnesturkey, malaysia, indonesia
20211.0 million tonnesturkey (33%), malaysia, indonesia

china banned plastic waste imports in 2018 (“national sword” policy). eu waste redirected to other countries.

what happens to exported “recyclables”

destinationdocumented outcome
turkeyillegal dumping, burning documented
malaysiaillegal processing facilities
indonesiacontamination of agricultural land
vietnamimport bans triggered by eu waste

e-waste data

metricfigure
eu e-waste generated12+ million tonnes/year
”officially recycled”~40%
actually traced to proper recyclingmuch lower
exported (legal + illegal)significant portion

agbogbloshie, ghana

  • world’s largest e-waste dump
  • significant portion: eu-origin electronics
  • documented by basel action network
  • health impacts: lead poisoning, respiratory disease
  • workers: often children

the flow:

  • eu “donates” used electronics as “charity”
  • electronics don’t work
  • classified as “used goods” not waste (evades regulations)
  • dumped in ghana
  • burned for copper recovery
  • toxic fumes, contaminated soil

the recycling statistics

what eu reportswhat actually happens
”recycled”exported
”recovered”burned for energy
”processed”unknown fate after export

eu definition of “recycled”:

  • includes: sent to recycling facility
  • does not require: actually recycled
  • does not track: post-export fate
  • result: inflated recycling rates

basel convention

the law

  • bans export of hazardous waste to non-oecd countries
  • eu is signatory
  • e-waste is hazardous waste

the evasion

methodhow it works
”used goods” classificationcall broken electronics “donations"
"recycling” classificationclaim waste will be recycled abroad
misdeclarationlabel waste as something else
mixinghide hazardous waste in legal shipments

the ocean plastic narrative

eu messaging

claimcommon source
”asia responsible for ocean plastic”various eu studies
”rivers in asia main source”eu-funded research
”eu leads on plastic solutions”eu communications

what the data shows

factorimplication
eu exports plastic waste to asiaorigin is eu
waste mismanaged in destinationmanagement failure, not origin
”asian rivers” carry eu wastegeography, not responsibility
per capita plastic consumptioneu higher than many asian countries

case study: turkey

metricdata
eu plastic waste to turkey 2021330,000+ tonnes
turkey’s own plastic wastealready struggling to manage
illegal dumping documentedyes (bbc, dw investigations)
burning documentedyes

the irony:

  • turkey is eu candidate country
  • eu criticizes turkey on various issues
  • eu sends turkey waste it can’t handle
  • turkey’s environment damaged by eu waste
  • eu doesn’t count this in own environmental footprint

the colonial pattern

colonial eracurrent era
colonies as resource extractionglobal south as resource extraction
colonies as dumping groundglobal south as waste destination
wealth flows to europeclean statistics stay in europe
harm stays in coloniespollution stays in destination

the destinations share characteristics:

  • lower gdp per capita
  • less regulatory enforcement capacity
  • less geopolitical power
  • often former colonies

what this suggests

eu domestic narrativeexport reality
”we recycle”we export
”circular economy”linear to africa
”we’re reducing emissions”offshored to china
”we’re safe”exported harm

the waste pattern mirrors the emissions pattern: externalize harm, claim credit for cleanliness.


sources

  • basel action network. e-waste tracking studies.
  • eurostat. waste export statistics.
  • bbc investigations. turkey plastic dumping.
  • deutsche welle. illegal waste trade documentation.
  • european environment agency. waste statistics.
  • interpol. environmental crime reports.
  • greenpeace. plastic waste export tracking.

rune.ᛞ

© 2024 - 2026 rune.みんな
Powered by theme astro-koharu · Inspired by Shoka